The Haryana Women’s Commission should take cognizance of the comments made by BJP MP Ram Chander Jangra about women who lost their husbands in the Pahalgam terrorist attack in April, senior Haryana Congress leader, Pearl Chaudhary said Sunday.
Jangra, during a public event in Bhiwani on Saturday, said, “Women, who lost their husbands, did not have the spirit and vigour. Therefore, they became victims of the attack … Terrorists do not leave one with requests. Our people died with folded hands… Had they fought, the casualties would have been fewer,” Jangra had said at an event organised to mark the 300th birth anniversary of Ahilyabai Holkar.
Chaudhary said his statements were a case fit for the Commission to take cognisance.
“If you look at the what the law (the Haryana State Commission for Women Act) says, the body’s function is to ‘investigate and examine all matters relating to the safeguards provided for women under the Constitution and other laws’, and ‘take suo motu notice of matters relating to deprivation of women’s rights… Comparing the widows, who were just tourists, to warriors of the past out of context, is not right,” she said.
“Those queens were mentally prepared for war at the time. What the MP has said… Just imagine he is implying that Himashi Narwal was not willing to fight for her husband. His remarks will leave a permanent scar on her; the Commission ought to have stepped in and asked for his resignation.”
Haryana Women’s Commission chairperson Renu Bhatia on Sunday told that she will speak to Jangra before taking a call on action against him.
“I am not in town… I have yet to go through the contents of the (MP’s) speech in question. From whatever little I heard from others and through the media, it is very unclear what his intent was. Whether it was said in a positive or negative context has to be seen. I will speak with him first, get his explanation and then decide (on what to do). The commission has not planned anything yet,” Bhatia said.
The chairperson had earlier this month sought action against Ashoka University Assistant Professor Ali Khan Mahmudabad over his social media post on Operation Sindoor and filed a police complaint against him.
Chaudhary, meanwhile, said there was a “pervasive anti-women mindset in the saffron party”.
“There should be an open debate on the remarks. In the professor’s case, the way she (Bhatia) conducted herself was totally wrong and indefensible.”
Jangra, meanwhile, told The Indian Express that nobody at the event had objected, and women there took selfies with him after and praised his speech.
“There is no question of me being against the martyrs or their wives. In fact, I am such an emotional man that I could not sleep for days after the terror attack, so how does the question of insulting the victims and widows even arise.”
He added that the remarks had been made specifically in the context of Ahilyabai’s life, of her bravery and her not surrendering to enemies.
“I spoke at around 10 am. Only in the evening the news channels took distorted clippings of my speech and kept playing it on loop. Before that I was not aware. The party asked me for an explanation, and I told them about the context of my words, and my respect for the victims… In no way did I show disrespect to what the terror attack victims had to go through.”
