A 21-year-old Indian Army aspirant recently moved the after he was allegedly denied a domicile certificate required to participate in the second phase of the Army recruitment process.
According to reports, the aspirant’s plea came after his mother’s name was deleted from the electoral rolls during the Special Intensive Revision () exercise.
The High Court on Friday agreed to hear the petition filed by the aspirant, who sought directions regarding the issuance of a domicile certificate to allow him to proceed with the recruitment process. The matter was brought up before Justice Krishna Rao, who agreed to take up the aspirant’s plea after hearing his submissions.
In his submission, the petitioner stated that the authorities had denied him a on the grounds that his mother’s name had been removed from the electoral rolls during the SIR exercise. However, he pointed out that his father’s name continued to appear on the electoral rolls despite the revision. He also noted that his own name had not yet been registered on the electoral rolls, as he had only recently turned 21.
The removal of his mother’s name from the , while his father’s name remained listed, reportedly complicated his efforts to secure the required domicile certificate.
The inability to secure a domicile certificate has reportedly prevented the aspirant from moving further in the Army recruitment process. The 21-year-old approached the Calcutta High Court seeking relief, as the certificate is mandatory for participation in the second phase of recruitment.
After hearing the petitioner’s arguments, Justice Krishna Rao agreed to take up the matter and scheduled it for a hearing.
The case highlights concerns over how changes to electoral records could affect the issuance of domicile certificates, especially when such documents are necessary for recruitment procedures. The petitioner is seeking the certificate to ensure that he does not miss the opportunity to advance in the ongoing Army selection process. The High Court is yet to deliver a ruling on his plea.
A similar concern has also surfaced in another case before the Calcutta High Court, where a student’s passport application was reportedly affected after his mother’s name was deleted from the electoral rolls during the SIR exercise.
In a separate case, an MBBS student from Malda in northern West Bengal moved the Calcutta High Court amid a passport issuance row after his mother’s name was deleted from the electoral rolls. On Thursday, the High Court directed the petitioner to implead the state government in the case so that it could clarify what additional documents the candidate might need to submit.
According to a Times of India report, the woman, identified as Bibi Kajali, approached the court after her son secured admission to an course in Bangladesh and applied for a passport. His application, however, was reportedly held up after his mother’s name was deleted from the electoral rolls. The student’s name was included in the SIR electoral roll this year, and he also reportedly voted in the state .
Kajali had challenged the deletion of her name before the Appellate Tribunal, where her appeal is still pending. Before the court’s Puja vacation, which began on October 16, Justice Krishna Rao had requested the tribunal to expedite the matter, preferably disposing of it within two weeks.
The two cases have brought renewed attention to the impact of the SIR exercise in West Bengal. According to Election Commission data, nearly 91 lakh names were deleted from the state’s electoral rolls after the exercise concluded.
