The Centre on Wednesday introduced the , 2026, in Lok Sabha as Opposition members charged that the bill is “dangerous” and “draconian”.
Opposing the introduction of the Bill under Rule 72 of the Rules of Procedure, Congress member Manish Tewari said it “suffers from excessive delegation of essential legislative functions”.
“Core aspects-such as the manner of vesting, management, disposal of assets, timelines, exemptions, and even appellate structures-are left to be prescribed by the Central Government through rules. This effectively reduces Parliament to enacting a skeletal framework, contrary to the settled constitutional principle that essential legislative policy must be determined by the legislature itself,” he said.
“The Bill enables wide and unguided executive control over property, including provisional and permanent vesting of assets in a “Designated authority” with powers of management, transfer, and disposal. This raises serious concerns under Article 300A, as deprivation of property must be just, fair, and accompanied by adequate safeguards-none of which are meaningfully embedded in the statute,” he said.
By mandating prior Central approval before the initiation of an investigation, the Bill potentially compromises the independence of enforcement and creates scope for selective application, thereby offending Article 14, Tewari added.
Congress member Gowaal Kagada Padvi said it is a “draconian” Bill. TMC member Pratima Mondal also opposed the introduction of the Bill, terming it “dangerous”.
Responding to the Opposition members’ observations, Minister of State for Home Affairs Nityanand Rai said the Bill aims to enhance transparency and ensure proper utilisation of funds received from abroad, but individuals engaging in forced religious conversion through foreign funding will not be spared.
Rai asserted that the Bill is “indeed dangerous” for those who engage in forced religious conversion using foreign contributions, as well as to individuals who abuse foreign funding for personal gain.
“The objective of this Bill is not to hinder any educational institution or NGO that wishes to serve the nation, provided that its aims align with the sovereignty and integrity of the country’s ethos, and that it acts in conformity with the Constitution and laws of India. I also wish to make it clear that if anyone attempts to operate in contravention of the spirit of the Indian Constitution, the laws of the land, or the national interest, the Modi government will not tolerate it. We are fully prepared to take action against such entities, in accordance with the law,” Rai said.
After Rai’s intervention, Krishna Prasad Tenneti, who was in the chair, called for a vote on the motion, which was accepted by voice vote. Then Rai introduced the Bill.
